do away with
US
・UK
A1 初級
phr. v.片語動詞去掉
We need to do away with all these luxuries we cannot afford
phr. v.片語動詞廢除
The company decided to do away with the old computer system.
phr. v.片語動詞殺掉
The gangster threatened to do away with anyone who betrayed him.
影片字幕
你是哪一派？為什麼傳簡訊跟講電話的感覺會如此不同？(Why Does Texting Feel Different from Talking? | Otherwords)
- Asynchronous communication can also do away with filler words, those ums and likes, and you knows, we use when we're trying to complete a thought.
非同步通訊還可以消除填充詞，那些“嗯”和“喜歡”，你知道，當我們試圖完成一個想法時，我們會使用這些填充詞。
- Asynchronous communication can also do away with filler words, those ums and likes and you knows we use when we're trying to complete a thought.
尤其是在這個總是在線、在家工作的時代，書面交流不再感覺那麼異步。
總是覺得自己被人利用？首先你要學會讓別人尊重你的 6 種方法 (6 Ways to Get People to Respect You (Avoid Being Taken Advantage Of))
- But do away with them
但應該努力擺脫它們。
- But do away with them.
有內部控制感的人認為，發生在自己身上的事情受到自己的行為、能力或錯誤的強烈影響，從而踐行自尊。
賈克·佛斯科．社會控術學入門｜賴瑞金專訪 (1974) (Jacque Fresco - Introduction to Sociocyberneering - Larry King (1974))
- and do away with the red tide.
LK: 一個圖像螢幕? JF: 一個圖像螢幕 安放在牆裡的
- oxygenate the water, and do away with the red tide.
充氧於水 就可以除掉紅潮(一種海洋災害)
謝斯特頓圍籬：別毀了你不懂的東西！ (Chesterton Fence: Don’t Destroy What You Don’t Understand!)
- Chesterton's fence is a simple rule of thumb that suggests that you should never destroy a fence, change a rule, or do away with a tradition until you understand why it's there in the first place. The principle assumes that fences have a purpose, were carefully planned, and cost time and money to erect.
切斯特頓的柵欄是一條簡單的經驗法則，它建議在瞭解柵欄存在的初衷之前，永遠不要破壞柵欄、改變規則或廢除傳統。 這一原則假定柵欄是有目的的，是經過精心策劃的，是花費時間和金錢建立起來的。
- Chesterton's fence is a simple rule of thumb that suggests that you should never destroy a fence, change a rule, or do away with a tradition until you understand why it's there in the first place.
切斯特頓的柵欄是一條簡單的經驗法則，它建議在瞭解柵欄存在的初衷之前，永遠不要破壞柵欄、改變規則或廢除傳統。 這一原則假定柵欄是有目的的，是經過精心策劃的，是花費時間和金錢建立起來的。
思想史：餐桌禮儀的演變！ (HISTORY OF IDEAS - Manners)
- Rousseau now contrasts favourably with modern mannered people. Rousseau tells us that people living in what he calls the state of nature were, in his eyes, far superior to educated and mannered Parisians. Their manners may have been simple, but they were honest and forthright, without the sins of what he now terms the over-civilised. Rousseau retells the story of civilisation as one of loss and decline, from a primordial state of fresh-faced curiosity, honesty and enthusiasm, to barbarous over-politeness, fakery and deceit. He describes the elaborate French court at Versailles as less civilised than an early human cave. Readers across Europe are astonished, and not a little impressed, by this impudence. For hundreds of years, moralists have been arguing that our natural selves are wild, harmful, over-sexual and dangerous, and that we must learn to tame them for the sake of others. Now Rousseau suggests the diametrical opposite. Civilisation has gone too far, it's our mannered selves that have become the problem, and the task of a properly evolved civilisation is to throw off the chains of manners, to relax us, strip off the etiquette and return to primitive frankness. Rousseau's point continues to echo down to our own times. It is his voice we can hear whenever someone sticks up for the simpler life, and suggests we dress less formally, eat dinner more casually and more readily say whatever is passing through our minds. New York, United States, 1827. A French aristocrat, Alexis de Tocqueville, is on a tour of the young United States in an effort to understand the spirit of a new kind of society, a democracy. He is immediately struck by American manners, or lack thereof. In Europe, reflects de Tocqueville, manners have been codified to emphasise hierarchical differences between people. Ordinary people defer to aristocrats, aristocrats to royalty, and so on. But in the United States, everything is done so as to suggest that there are no differences between people. No one takes off their hat to anyone, a postman can casually greet a judge, a mule driver can strike up cheerful banter with a wealthy merchant, and one cannot tell by someone's clothes whether they might be living in a mansion or a hut. Expressions like how you doing and hi are heard everywhere across the new republic. It could be charming, but the aristocratic de Tocqueville wryly notes a problem. These casual manners do not do away with class and wealth differences. They merely sentimentally disguise them. The manners of old Europe have been accused of being cruel in their stress on hierarchy.
現在，盧梭與現代舉止得體的人形成了鮮明的對比。盧梭告訴我們，在他眼中，生活在他所稱的自然狀態下的人們遠比受過教育、舉止得體的巴黎人優越。他們的舉止或許簡單，但他們誠實、直率，沒有他現在所說的過度文明人的罪惡。盧梭重述了文明的失落和衰落，從最初的好奇、誠實和熱情，到野蠻的過度禮貌、虛假和欺騙。他描繪了凡爾賽宮的精緻法國宮廷，其文明程度還不如人類早期的洞穴。整個歐洲的讀者都為這種厚顏無恥的行為感到震驚，同時也留下了深刻的印象。數百年來，道德家們一直在論證，我們的天性是狂野的、有害的、過度的性慾和危險的，為了他
- These casual manners do not do away with class and wealth differences.
川普稱伊朗戰爭是「短期出兵」！德黑蘭發生巨大爆炸！ (Trump calls Iran war a “Short-term excursion” as massive explosions rock Tehran)
- Once again, the same taglines he had in his State of the Union address, visceral attack on Democrats trying to change the voting system, do away with mail in IDs, not have women playing in men's sports.
再一次，他國情諮文裡的口號，對民主黨員的強烈攻擊，試圖改變投票系統，廢除郵寄身份證，不讓女性參加男子運動。
- Um, once again, the same taglines he had in his State of the Union address, uh, visceral attack on Democrats, uh, trying to change the voting system, do away with mail-in IDs, uh, not have women playing in men's sports, all these, um, taglines that, that he used assiduously in his State of the Union address.
再一次，他國情諮文裡的口號，對民主黨員的強烈攻擊，試圖改變投票系統，廢除郵寄身份證，不讓女性參加男子運動。
美國離內戰有多近？ | The Gray Area (How close is America to civil conflict? | The Gray Area)
- And then we also know it allows the leader to declare emergency rule and basically do away with any sort of democratic constraints as long as the war is going on.
但是，學術界是否有一個常見的門檻，對吧？也就是說，如果人口中有一定比例的人同情或願意使用政治暴力來推進政治目標，一旦超過這個數字，你就進入了危險區域？
- And then we also know it allows the leader to declare emergency rule and basically do away with any sort of democratic constraints as long as the war is going on.
而且我們也知道，這能讓領導人在戰爭期間宣佈緊急狀態，基本上取消任何民主限制。
